Injured officers are usually surprised to learn they can collect tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars for injuries which occur during stolen car chases, dog knockdowns, slip and falls on defective premises, assaults by persons during arrests and serving warrants, falls on snow and ice, responses to rescue victims and hit and run accidents.
Injured police officers often assume their receipt of base wages from the City under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 41, Section 111F legally bars them from any further recovery in connection with their injury. Others often believe their superiors will be upset with them if they make such claims and they are afraid of rocking the boat. This is especially true of new officers.
Police officers are not second class citizens. They have the same rights as any other citizen to be compensated for their injuries. The governing statute, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 41, Section 111F, under which injured police officers are paid their base wages while out injured on duty, authorizes the same injured officers to go to Court and bring actions to further recover compensation for their injuries. In fact, if the injured officer does not bring an action against the third party responsible for his injury, the City paying him § 111F benefits is authorized to do so by the same passage in the statute.
The City paying the injured officer pursuant to G.L. c. 41, § 111F is entitled to recoup from the responsible third party all monies which it has paid the officer for his injured on duty wages and for his medical expenses pursuant to G.L. c. 41, § 100. When an injured officer brings an action against the responsible third party, he is responsible under G.L. c. 41, §111F to reimburse the City for monies which it has paid out from any monies which he recovers. It is therefore in the City’s financial interest that the injured officer pursue his rights. It becomes a win-win situation for both the City and the injured officer.
We will collect as much money as possible for police officers injured on duty.
We can get justice for these injuries to children which sometimes can last a lifetime.
Incompetence and poor training of employees can result in avoidable injuries.
We will fight for compensation for injuries due to dangerous, preventable conditions.
We fight for clients injured due to a failure to provide the right kind and level of security.
Call us if you have been injured due to failure of suitable warning regarding potential danger.
Our goal is to collect as much money as possible for firefighters injured on duty.
Helping victims of Uber/Lyft rideshare accidents secure compensation for injuries and damages.
Fighting for victims of truck crashes against negligent drivers, companies, and insurers.
Advocating for seniors harmed by nursing home neglect or abuse, ensuring justice for them and their families.
Compensation is available to veterans and their families that were at Camp Lejeune
free case evaluation
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
We have specialized in personal injury law for the last 40 years, and we’re still going strong. Because personal injury is our sole focus, you can rest assured you are getting the most targeted, skilled and experienced legal services possible. We have successfully represented clients from every corner of Massachusetts, from Pittsfield to Provincetown.
The work we do for our clients not only provides justice for their harms and losses, but it also makes our communities safer for everyone. When you’ve been injured in an accident, you need the best in legal representation. We know our way through the system, and our experience and expertise give us an advantage over other lawyers. Get in touch today for your free consultation.
Copyright © 2024 Ballin & Associates, LLC Personal Injury Attorneys Foxborough, MA
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.