$2.5 Million Settlement for Police Officer Injured on Road Construction Detail

A middle-aged man with short gray hair wearing a dark suit, blue shirt, and red striped tie stands in front of a blurred indoor background.Construction sites in general are dangerous places.  According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 1,000 construction workers lost their lives due to job-related injuries in 2019, more fatalities than any other industry.   Road construction work is particularly risky, because of the heavy equipment that is required to move large amounts of materials in order to build a roadway.

Bob Jones, an employee of a construction company, was operating a large dump truck with a trailer attached to it at a road construction site.  Larry Walsh, a police officer, was working a traffic detail at the site, helping to direct traffic around the work zone.  Later in the afternoon, Jones unexpectedly began to back his truck up, even though there was no reason for him to do so.  Officer Walsh was standing directly behind the trailer which was attached to the truck, facing in the direction of the oncoming traffic, so he did not see that the trailer was coming towards him.  Another police officer did see the truck and trailer start to move, and yelled to Officer Walsh to look out, but it was too late.  The back end of the trailer struck Officer Walsh in the back, knocking him forward.

Jones violated one of the cardinal rules of construction site safety – never back up any vehicle if you do not know what is behind you.  The risks involved in backing vehicles up at construction sites are well known.  According to the U.S. Occupational Health and Safety Administration, over 70 construction workers were killed in back-over incidents in 2011 alone, and dump trucks are the most likely type of vehicle to be involved in a fatal back-over incident.  Anyone who is operating a dump truck must be extremely careful to ensure that no one is injured when the driver moves the truck.

We believed that there were any number of simple things Jones could have done to move his truck safely.  He could have told Officer Walsh that he was about to move the truck.  He could have told one of his co-workers that he was about to back up, and asked the co-worker to act as a spotter to guide him backwards.  Jones could have done a “walk around” the truck to make sure that no one was standing behind the truck.  He could have sounded his horn before moving the truck, which would have alerted everyone nearby that he was about to move the truck.  He did none of these things.

Officer Walsh was seriously injured, as you would expect when someone is struck by a 20 ton vehicle.  He underwent two major surgeries to his back.  The first surgery involved the removal of portions of his spine, and bolting his spine to his pelvis with metal plates, rods and screws.  The second surgery was a revision and expansion to the first surgery, resulting in the placement of additional hardware in his back.  Despite these two surgeries, and a very lengthy course of medical treatment, Officer Walsh was never able to return to work as a police officer.  At this point, his condition is unlikely to improve.

We filed a lawsuit on behalf of Officer Walsh against the construction company.  We also brought a claim on behalf of Officer Walsh’s wife, for the damages that the incident had caused to their marriage and their lives as a whole.  The company’s attorneys responded that Officer Walsh should not have been standing where he was.  We did not consider this to be a valid excuse.  The possibility that someone might be standing behind the truck and trailer is precisely why the driver is required to communicate with the other workers and do a walkaround before backing up.

After extended pre-trial discovery, we went to mediation with an experienced and effective mediator, and the insurance companies agreed to pay $2.5 million to Officer Walsh and his wife.  Officer Walsh and his wife were happy with the settlement and to be able to resolve the case.

In order to protect the privacy of the injured officer and witnesses, all names have been changed. Any resemblance to names of real persons, past or present, is merely coincidental and not intended. The injured officer agreed to have this article published in order that public safety officers around the Commonwealth be better educated about their legal rights to compensation when injured.

Richard L. Miller, Esq.

Related articles
Free Case Evaluation

Contact our team today and let’s work toward a solution together.

Emblem with "The National Trial Lawyers Top 100" in bold text, featuring a depiction of Lady Justice holding scales.
Blue badge displaying "Rated by Super Lawyers," the name "Steven M. Ballin," and the website "SuperLawyers.com.
A badge reading "America's Top 100 Personal Injury Attorneys 2024" with a blue and silver design.
Image showing a blue plaque labeled "Rated by Super Lawyers, Rising Stars, Zachary Ballin, SuperLawyers.com.
A round badge for "America's Top 100 Personal Injury Attorneys" with an eagle design and the year 2024 in the center.
Emblem with "The National Trial Lawyers Top 100" in bold text, featuring a depiction of Lady Justice holding scales.
Blue badge displaying "Rated by Super Lawyers," the name "Steven M. Ballin," and the website "SuperLawyers.com.
A badge reading "America's Top 100 Personal Injury Attorneys 2024" with a blue and silver design.
Image showing a blue plaque labeled "Rated by Super Lawyers, Rising Stars, Zachary Ballin, SuperLawyers.com.
A round badge for "America's Top 100 Personal Injury Attorneys" with an eagle design and the year 2024 in the center.

Injured in an Accident?
Ballin Law is Here to Help

For over 40 years of experience since 1981, we’ve exclusively handled personal injury cases. Ballin Law is ready to fight for your rights and secure your future.

Name(Required)
Untitled(Required)
Name(Required)
Untitled(Required)

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

We have specialized in personal injury law for the last 40 years, and we’re still going strong. Because personal injury is our sole focus, you can rest assured you are getting the most targeted, skilled and experienced legal services possible. We have successfully represented clients from every corner of Massachusetts, from Pittsfield to Provincetown.


The work we do for our clients not only provides justice for their harms and losses, but it also makes our communities safer for everyone. When you’ve been injured in an accident, you need the best in legal representation. We know our way through the system, and our experience and expertise give us an advantage over other lawyers. Get in touch today for your free consultation.

Massachusetts Personal Injury Attorney

Representing Clients Throughout The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
For 35 years, Ballin & Associates has represented clients who have been injured throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. A sampling of these communities includes, but is not limited to, Andover, Arlington, Attleboro, Auburn, Beverly, Billerica, Boston, Braintree, Brockton, Brookline, Cambridge, Canton, Chelmsford, Chelsea, Dartmouth, Dedham, Easton, Everett, Fall River, Falmouth, Fitchburg, Foxborough, Framingham, Franklin, Gloucester, Haverhill, Holyoke, Lawrence, Leominster, Lexington, Lowell, Lynn, Malden, Mansfield, Marlborough, Medford, Methuen, Middleborough. Millbury, Natick, New Bedford, Needham, Newton, Norwood, Peabody, Pittsfield, Plymouth, Quincy, Randolph, Revere, Salem, Seekonk, Sharon, Shrewsbury, Somerville, Springfield, Stoughton, Swansea, Taunton, Walpole, Waltham, Watertown, Wellesley, West Springfield, Westwood, Weymouth, Woburn, and Worcester. Please see the complete list of communities where we have represented clients on injury matters in the past.

Copyright © 2024 Ballin & Associates, LLC Personal Injury Attorneys Foxborough, MA

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.